While I was at Doug and Meghan’s house on Monday, we got into a little discussion on evolution. As I’ve posted before, I don’t hold to any particular opinion on how it all came to be, simply a firm belief that the earth and, in particular, humankind were crafted by the hand of God. The rest is really up to Him.
But there has come a point, as I told Meghan, where I am starting to bemoan my own lack of knowledge in certain areas, like models for the evolution of Homo sapiens. I mean, I’m taking Biological Anthropology this semester and I’ll be taking Human Origins in the spring. I am comfortable with not knowing. I am comfortable with leaving things up to faith. But what I am not comfortable with is avoiding a particular line of thought not because I don’t agree, but because I simply haven’t educated myself on the subject.
And how ironic that we should have this discussion the night before NOVA’s “Judgement Day: Intelligent Design on Trial” aired on PBS. It’s a 2 hour exploration of the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial over the inclusion of ‘Intelligent Design’ in the science curriculum. The program itself is not surprisingly a little biased in favor of evolutionary theory, but I thought that overall it gave a pretty fair account of the case. It did raise a lot of thoughts about the intersection of faith and science, and I’ll try to formulate some more coherent thoughts to post later.
In the meantime, Meghan let me borrow The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. I think now may be a good time to start reading it…